SYLVA–It’s a mystery.
In the Sylva area, where two strong economic engines are a university and a hospital, there is almost no real “starter” housing, built with young professionals in mind. In an economic and societal climate that has families seeking out a more “walkable” lifestyle, the town of Sylva, which has an appealing downtown, has seen almost no new home construction in the past decade, despite solid growth outside town limits.
Before now, no larger development has come along to take advantage of the need. In fact, Sylva’s antiquated zoning ordinances not only discourage higher-density construction, they in many cases make such construction impossible.
As with most things, a mystery won’t go unnoticed forever, though, and this one hasn’t.
The Cashiers-based Taurus Development Group recently requested a zoning ordinance amendment for property located off Savannah Drive and Yellowbird Branch Road in Sylva, and plans to develop the 48-acre tract with 68 town homes and 51 single-family homes, ranging in price from the mid $100,000’s to the mid $300,000’s. The project, upon completion, could increase Sylva’s population by some ten percent. Sylva’s planning board has voted unanimously to recommend that the board approve the amendment.
This development comes on the heels of an announced smaller, but in some ways similar, development on Elm Street. Sapphire developer Art Pohl received a zoning ordinance amendment to build a series of more upscale townhomes just East of the Taurus project, on Elm Street.
Both housing projects intend to take advantage of existing or proposed infrastructure, from sidewalks to water and sewer, and tout “best building” practices that are being finely honed in some areas of the country, but are just on the planning horizon in the mountains. These practices include systems that reuse storm water and structures that are hyper-efficient in terms of heating and cooling.
Sylva Town Planning Director Jim Aust values these “green” practices, but seems to value the larger principles at play even more. He sees the positive aspects of traditional community structure meeting 21st century needs.
“Clustering housing reduces the carbon signature, minimizes degradation of water quality and provides attainability by people in the middle income brackets,” Aust said. He went on to say that higher-density development also keeps infrastructure costs lower.
Still, the concepts surrounding “downtown living” are outside the frame of reference for many in the area. It was never particularly part of the culture here, (although some people lived in town, to be sure).
“I just don’t believe people come to Sylva for ‘density’”, said Town Council member Maurice Moody, a native whose career took him away, but who retired to Sylva. Moody has been a strong proponent of the rights of large-lot homeowners, but is also and has been an advocate for a downtown focus in town government.

Is high-density in mountain towns a realistic model?
Aust thinks so. Not only is it a realistic model, he says, but he thinks it’s inevitable.
“It’s coming,” he says. “With all these baby-boomers retiring; they want to live in the mountains, but they want to be where they can walk places. They don’t want to spend their time cutting grass.”
Coldwell Banker president Jim Gillespie, in a recent interview, concurred.
“Over the past several years we have seen a boom in downtown living all over the country, and this is not just reserved to major cities,” he said.
Gillespie’s observation came on the heels of a large Coldwell Banker in-house study that showed strong evidence of the trend. While some of this movement is pushed by necessity, as fuel prices make the all-American live-in-your-car lifestyle less desirable, much of it is clearly evidence of a shift in lifestyle preferences as well.
“People are being drawn to the convenience and culture of walkable urban neighborhoods across the country—even when those neighborhoods are small,” wrote Christopher B. Leinberger in a widely publicized article in The Atlantic Magazine.
“When the Baby Boomers were young,” Leinburger wrote, “families with children made up more than half of all households; by 2000, they were only a third of households; and by 2025, they will be closer to a quarter. Young people are starting families later than earlier generations did, and having fewer children. The Boomers themselves are becoming empty-nesters, and many have voiced a preference for urban living. By 2025, the U.S. will contain about as many single-person households as families with children.”

The town of Highlands faces its own set of challenges.
As a resort town, it suffers the slings-and-arrows of a severely cyclical economy: a huge summer population and a small winter population. It also has limited land to build on, and what is available isn’t being developed for people with medium-to-low income brackets. This dynamic has forced many resort towns in the western U.S. into the subsidized housing market, and Highlands recently made a move in that direction.
The Town of Highlands created an affordable housing task force, and recently announced plans for a 48-unit apartment complex in which 24 units would be rented at market rate and the other 24 at a subsidized rate.
- Read Brian O’Shea’s piece about the complex in the Highlands Highlander, here.
- Read the Highlander’s recent editorial about affordable housing here.
- Read a recent piece about the Sylva project in the Smoky Mountain News here.